Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Chabadpedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Chaim Soloveitchik
(section)
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== His Learning Method ==== Rabbi Chaim innovated a learning method known as the "Brisk method." This method has become very widespread in the yeshiva world.<blockquote>This method was defined in its time by Rabbi Shlomo Yosef Zevin, who aptly described Rabbi Chaim's uniqueness, calling it "primaryness": "And there is 'primaryness' also because of completeness. The tears and halves, the scattering and separation, come in distance of place and distance of time from the source and the root. At the root point there is no 'cutting of the plantings.' And this primary completeness exists in Rabbi Chaim's teachings. Not completeness in area and scope, but that which penetrates into the very essence of a matter and grasps its nature and substance. Its entire nature and entire substance. As long as we have not obtained the matter in its deepest treasures, it is not in our possession in all its completeness. It is possible, for example, that a person knows 'the entire Torah' and yet about even one thing from the Torah we cannot say that 'his learning is in his hand.' It is possible that a person understands an entire sugya with all its commentaries, Rishonim and Acharonim, and yet does not feel the essence of the point. It is possible that a person may engage in pilpul in a known sugya with both sharpness and breadth of knowledge, and not necessarily with empty pilpul, but with matters of substance, and nevertheless he circles around the point without reaching it. Then completeness is deficient in two senses: in what is lacking and what is excessive. The 'depths' are lacking, the inner essence of the matter, and excessive are all those explanations and innovations that have attached themselves to the topic from the outside, and are not really relevant. Completeness both connects and separates simultaneously. It connects all parts of the matter, and separates the foreign branches that have become mixed in."</blockquote>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
Please note that all contributions to Chabadpedia are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Chabadpedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)