Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Chabadpedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Eating Matzah
(section)
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== During Galus (Exile) == During galus when we are unable to offer the Pesach sacrifice, there is a dispute in the Gemara whether the mitzvah is from the Torah. However, in halacha, the Gemara follows Rava's opinion that the obligation is from the Torah even during galus:<blockquote>Rava said: "Matzah nowadays is a Torah obligation, while maror is rabbinic. Why is maror different? Because it is written, 'with matzos and maror shall they eat it' - when there is a Pesach offering, there is [an obligation of] maror, and when there is no Pesach offering, there is no [Torah obligation of] maror. But regarding matzah as well, isn't it written 'with matzos and maror shall they eat it'? [For] matzah, the verse returns to it [to obligate it independently], [as it states] 'in the evening you shall eat matzos.' And Rav Acha bar Yaakov says both this [matzah] and that [maror] are rabbinic...A beraisa supports Rava: 'Six days you shall eat matzos, and on the seventh day shall be a solemn assembly to Hashem your G-d' - just as [eating matzah on] the seventh day is optional, so too [on] the six days it is optional... One might think that [eating matzah] on the first night is also optional; the verse therefore states 'with matzos and maror shall they eat it.' I only know [that the obligation applies] when the Beis HaMikdash exists; from where [do I know that it applies] when the Beis HaMikdash does not exist? The verse therefore states: 'in the evening you shall eat matzos' - the verse established it as an obligation." β Pesachim 120a</blockquote>This means that the Torah emphasizes that although both for matzah and maror it says "with matzos and maror shall they eat it," regarding matzah the Torah emphasizes "in the evening you shall eat matzos," indicating that even when there is no Pesach offering, there is an obligation to eat matzah. However, on the other days of Pesach, despite the prohibition of eating chametz, there is no obligation to eat matzah specifically, as our Sages interpret "just as [eating matzah on] the seventh day is optional, so too [on] the six days it is optional." ==== Women and the Mitzvah ==== Despite this being a time-bound positive commandment from which women are typically exempt, in this mitzvah both men and women are obligated because the Torah connects the prohibition of eating chametz to the commandment of eating matzah in the verse: "You shall not eat leaven with it; for seven days you shall eat with it matzos." Our Sages expounded: "Whoever is included in the prohibition of 'do not eat chametz' is included in the positive commandment of 'eat matzah,' and since women are included in the prohibition against eating chametz, they are included in the positive commandment to eat matzah." Tosafos gives an additional reason to obligate women in the mitzvah of matzah: that they too were under Pharaoh's decrees, which is the same reason for their obligation in the mitzvos of Purim. However, they explain that the obligation from this reasoning alone would only be rabbinic, while their obligation in matzah is from the Torah. Alternatively, from this reasoning alone we would not have known their obligation because there is a gezeirah shavah (textual comparison) from Sukkos to Pesach, and we would have exempted them based on this comparison (as women are exempt from the mitzvah of sukkah). Therefore, a special teaching is needed to obligate women in the mitzvah of matzah. ==== Its Innovation ==== Seemingly, there is an obligation on every Yom Tov to eat bread, and if so, on Pesach, when the Torah forbade eating chametz bread - automatically there would be an obligation to eat matzah. So what is the innovation in this mitzvah? The Ran explained that its requirement is specifically "lechem oni" (bread of affliction). And in the Shulchan Aruch of the Alter Rebbe, it is explained that the obligation to eat bread on Yom Tov is rabbinic, and on the first night of Pesach according to all opinions it is rabbinic. Thus, the Torah innovated an obligation to eat bread on the first night of Pesach (and the first night of Sukkos is learned from Pesach).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
Please note that all contributions to Chabadpedia are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Chabadpedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)