Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Chabadpedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Terumot
(section)
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Nullification of Terumah in One Hundred and One ==== Regarding the laws of nullification of terumah in one hundred and one, a law dealing with how terumah is nullified in one hundred and one, we learned in tractate Terumot: Rabbi Yehoshua says black figs elevate the white ones, white ones elevate the black ones [5500/1740]. Rabbi Eliezer forbids this [5500/1740], and Rabbi Akiva says if it is known what fell (black or white), they do not elevate each other, but when it is not known what fell, they elevate each other [5500/1740]. The reasoning of Rabbi Eliezer who forbids this law is simply understood, because in reality the terumah was only mixed with fifty, and either way there aren't one hundred of the type that fell. Commentators wrote that Rabbi Yehoshua holds that since if one wanted, he could crush and mix them all together, therefore they all combine to nullify it. Regarding Rabbi Akiva's reasoning for distinguishing between when it is known what fell and when it is not known, they wrote that when it is known which fig fell, black or white, "they do not elevate because one can eat the others, and since they are permitted, they do not help to nullify. But if it is not known whether a black one fell or a white one fell, since all are in doubt of prohibition, they elevate each other." This reasoning of Rabbi Yehoshua is difficult: what does it matter "that if one wanted, he could crush and mix them all together"? In reality, he did not grind and crush them, so how do they elevate each other? Rabbi Akiva's opinion also requires explanation: what does it matter if no one knows whether it was black or white and "all are in doubt of prohibition"? This doubt is only in a person's knowledge, but in reality - the terumah was not mixed with one hundred (since a white fig does not mix with a black fig (and vice versa), and in the language of Tosafot "the black ones cannot be in doubt of mixture because black ones are always recognizable among white ones"); so there is no mixture of one in one hundred here.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
Please note that all contributions to Chabadpedia are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Chabadpedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)