Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Chabadpedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Surrender and Decisiveness (Intellectual)
(section)
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Decisiveness of the Intellect == The Torah forbade taking bribes because "bribes blind the eyes of the wise and distort the words of the righteous"[2]. And since the Torah here refers to the judges of Israel with praise β calling them '''wise and righteous''', it is clear that it does not intend, G-d forbid, to suspect they would deliberately pervert Torah judgment from innocent to guilty or from guilty to innocent, for this would violate Torah law itself β so what does this have to do with taking bribes? Rather, the issue is that through taking a bribe, the liability appears very small in his eyes until he doesn't see it at all. Why? Because taking the bribe creates a connection between the judge and the litigant, and things can reach the point where the judge puts himself in the litigant's place. And since "a person doesn't see his own liability"[4], the judge also doesn't feel the liability of the litigant. This doesn't mean that he knows it's a liability and deliberately refuses to see it, but rather that due to his self-love, he '''doesn't see''' the liability at all. Because of this connection, any liability appears small in his eyes for '''correct''' intellectual reasons, as if it's not a liability at all. Therefore, this isn't considered violating Torah law, since he rules based on intellectual reasons that are in themselves correct '''and true'''. This intellectual bias comes from will, as the will '''transforms''' the intellect completely β and this is called '''decisiveness of the intellect''' from liability to merit. That is, when will prevails over intellect, it happens in a way that transforms its very essence β the same intellect and reasoning that previously showed liability now shows merit. As we find regarding the flood: initially "the wickedness of man was great"[5] led to "I regret that I made them"[6]. And afterward (through Noah offering a sacrifice that was a pleasing aroma to G-d), it is written "I will not continue etc."[7] for the reason that "the inclination of man's heart is evil from his youth"[8]. This is the very same reason that brought the flood β so what new development caused "I will not continue etc."? This means that through Noah's sacrifice and G-d smelling his offering, G-d's will inclined toward him, and through this the very same reason for liability was completely transformed into a reason for merit!
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
Please note that all contributions to Chabadpedia are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Chabadpedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)