Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Chabadpedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Gematria
(section)
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Gematria "With the Kolel" == Sometimes for the purpose of calculation, the word itself is added as a single number to the gematria value, and this form of calculation is called "with the kolel" or "missing gematria." An example of such a calculation: dimah (tear = 119) with the kolel (120) in gematria equals moed. The Rebbe brings a hint to this method also in halacha (in addition to its use in midrashim) regarding the number of lashes which is forty minus one, and this is learned from the juxtaposition of verses "in the number forty," "a count that is close to forty," that is: a calculation that completes a sum of forty. And the Rebbe explains that when there is a number that together with the completion adds up to forty, it is considered the number forty and through it one fulfills the commandment "forty shall he strike him," even though only 39 lashes are given, since it completes to forty. The nature of this calculation seems puzzling, and the Rebbe explains it based on the words of Rabbi Yosef Irgas: "At first glance, this seems contradictory, for the reason that one needs to add the kolel is because the calculation does not match, and if so, this is not a 'gematria'? Also: what is the reason that sometimes the calculation is with the kolel (or two kolels), and sometimes without the kolel? β This is not like the opinion of those who err that it is due to pressure, etc., since the calculation does not match, so they also add the kolel. Rather, everything is precise; sometimes the connection is only from the aspect of individual matters, and then we do not calculate the kolel, and sometimes the connection is not only from the aspect of individual matters, but also from the aspect of the general, and then we need to calculate the kolel, and without this it is impossible to accomplish the matter, and consequently something is missing in the gematria."
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
Please note that all contributions to Chabadpedia are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Chabadpedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)