Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Chabadpedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Bava Metzia
(section)
Article
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Explanations of the Tzemach Tzedek == '''Yeush''' (giving up hope) is a halachic state in which a person has given up hope of recovering his property that is not in his possession, thereby relinquishing his ownership of the object. "Yeush shelo midaat" (unconscious abandonment) is a situation where it is known that if the person had known that the object was lost, he would certainly have given up hope, but he has not yet heard about it and therefore has not consciously given up hope. There is a dispute between Abaye and Rava regarding the status of such an object. According to Abaye, it is not considered as if the person has given up hope, even though immediately upon hearing about it he would give up hope - this does not retroactively reveal that this was his true intention previously. But according to Rava, since it is clearly known that this would have been his intention (for he immediately gave up hope when he heard about it), and it is clear that in the previous situation he would have given up hope as well, it is considered as if he had actually given up hope earlier. Although there is a general dispute in the Talmud regarding whether "ein breira" (there is no retroactive designation) or "yesh breira" (there is retroactive designation), which relates to the general question of whether a later action can clarify a previous situation, such as setting aside terumah (priestly gifts) with the intention that what will be set aside in the future is what is designated as terumah now - despite this, the question of "yeush shelo midaat" is a separate issue and does not depend on that dispute. The reason for this is that with terumah, there is no reason to say that the terumah set aside later is the same terumah that would have been set aside earlier, and therefore the separation of terumah is a new designation and cannot clarify the past - according to the view that "ein breira." The situation with "yeush shelo midaat" is different, because here it is clear that even earlier, if he had heard about it, he certainly would have given up hope.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
Please note that all contributions to Chabadpedia are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 or later (see
Chabadpedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)